Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 ranks 6th of 9 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 4th of 9 in Tank range (957 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 1st of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.0 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).
208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6
145 hp, 8,0 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 ranks 6th of 9 in Combined consumption, 4th of 9 in Tank range, 1st of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
145hp
240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.0s
VMax 215 km/h
Cons.
4.6L
/100 km
Tank
44L
Full specifications Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Electric · 3 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 1,199 cm³ |
| Power | 145 hp |
| Couple | 240 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 44 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,0 s |
| VMax | 215 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,055 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm |
| Height | 1,430 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,235 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.0 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (6th of 9 in Combined consumption)
The 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 957 km (4th of 9 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 covers 957 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 stands against city cars hybrid
Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot 208 II range
Generation II launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Popular duels involving the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6
Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
957 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 9 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.