GB · GENERATION 2026 · CITY CAR
AudiICE

A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW

116 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 16 city cars 2024–2028, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 13 in Tank range, 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,69715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

116hp

200 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.7s

VMax 203 km/h

Cons.

5.6L

/100 km

Tank

40L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement999 cm³
Power116 hp
Couple200 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.6 L/100km
Tank40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,7 s
VMax203 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,029 mm
Wheelbase2,547 mm
Width1,740 mm
Height1,409 mm
Boot335 L
Kerb weight1,115 kg
Cd0.33
CO₂ WLTP128 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 16 city cars, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100), 2nd of 13 in Tank range (714 km), 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD (1st with 5.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 15 in Combined consumption)

The A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD (5.3 L/100).

Tank range: 714 km (2nd of 13 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW covers 714 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.

Segment positioning

Where the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW stands against city cars

Comparison across 16 city cars marketed between 2024–2028.

Combined consumption3e / 15
5.6 L/100
Min 6.6 L/100 · MINI Cooper S FWDMax 5.3 L/100 · Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD
Tank range2e / 13
714 km
Min 645 km · Audi A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kWMax 909 km · Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G
0–100 km/h6e / 16
9,7 s
Min 13,1 s · Hyundai i20 1.2 MPiMax 5,3 s · Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi A1 GB range

Generation GB launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the GB

Compare

Popular duels involving the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW

Frequently asked questions

Audi A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 16 city cars 2024–2028, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD), 2nd of 13 in Tank range (714 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).

714 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 13 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.