Among the 16 city cars 2024–2028, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD), 2nd of 13 in Tank range (714 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW
116 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 16 city cars 2024–2028, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 13 in Tank range, 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
116hp
200 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.7s
VMax 203 km/h
Cons.
5.6L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Full specifications Audi A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 999 cm³ |
| Power | 116 hp |
| Couple | 200 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,7 s |
| VMax | 203 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,029 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,547 mm |
| Width | 1,740 mm |
| Height | 1,409 mm |
| Boot | 335 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,115 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 128 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 16 city cars, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 15 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100), 2nd of 13 in Tank range (714 km), 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD (1st with 5.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 15 in Combined consumption)
The A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD (5.3 L/100).
Tank range: 714 km (2nd of 13 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW covers 714 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW stands against city cars
Comparison across 16 city cars marketed between 2024–2028.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A1 GB range
Generation GB launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the GB
Popular duels involving the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW
Audi A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
714 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 13 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD leads in Combined consumption (5.3 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW vs Citroen C3 PureTech 100 FWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.