Among the 43 D-SUV 2017–2021, the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 ranks 3rd of 43 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the BMW X3 xDrive20d), 43th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (8.6 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8Petrol
DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8
182 hp, 8,6 s 0-100 : among the 43 D-SUV 2017–2021, the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 ranks 3rd of 43 in Combined consumption, 43th of 43 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
182hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.6s
VMax 217 km/h
Cons.
5.1L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Power
- 182 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.1 L/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,6 s
- VMax
- 217 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 1,654 kg
- Cd
- 0.33
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 43 D-SUV, the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 43 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 43 in Combined consumption)
The 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 43 D-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption3e / 43
5.1 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · BMW X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h43e / 43
8,6 s
Min 8,6 s · DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8Max 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
PetrolBMW X3 xDrive20i 2018184 hp · 8.3 sPetrolBMW X3 xDrive20i 2021184 hp · 8.3 sPetrolBMW X4 xDrive20i 2018184 hp · 8.3 sPetrolBMW X4 xDrive20i 2021184 hp · 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8
Continue with the DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8
The same car, from other angles.
DS 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 vs BMW X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.