Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 3,71 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 812 Superfast | iX M60 I20 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2.93 s | 3.71 s | 0.79 s · 812 Superfast |
| 400 m standing start | 10.38 s | 11.94 s | 1.56 s · 812 Superfast |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18.82 s | 21.85 s | 3.03 s · 812 Superfast |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h | 250 km/h | 77 km/h · 812 Superfast |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1.91 kg/hp | 4.26 kg/hp | better ratio · 812 Superfast |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 812 Superfast | iX M60 I20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.85 s · tight gap | 0.93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.43 s · tight gap | 1.54 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.29 s | 2.67 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2.93 s | 3.71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3.64 s | 5.03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5.54 s | 8.60 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8.29 s | 13.69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10.38 s | 11.94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18.82 s | 21.85 s |
| Top speed limited | 327 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
Off the line, the 812 Superfast hits 100 km/h in 2.93 s versus 3.72 s for the iX M60. Despite lacking instant torque, 799 hp of power compensates. At this point, the 812 Superfast leads by 0.79 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 Superfast is doing 182 km/h against 151 km/h for the iX M60. The gap is 0.88 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 Superfast crosses the line in 10.37 s versus 11.94 s. The 1.57 s gap represents roughly 79 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 812 Superfast continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 249 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 Superfast finishes in 18.81 s versus 21.84 s, with a 3.03 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the iX M60 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.80 seconds. The 0.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 3,71 s).
812 Superfast goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 Superfast: 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp.
812 Superfast: 327 km/h. iX M60 I20: 250 km/h.