Sur 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 gagne (8,05 s vs 8,18 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s−0,13 s | 8,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s−0,06 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s−0,82 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h+22 km/h | 211 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,24 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,75 s | 3,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,07 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 8,18 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,66 s | 11,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,80 s | 23,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 38,38 s | 58,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 16,12 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 211 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 989 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 hits 100 km/h in 8.05 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. Despite the faster sprint time, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is 9 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is doing 115 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 0.23 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 crosses the line in 16.06 s versus 16.11 s. The 0.05 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 163 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 finishes in 28.98 s versus 29.80 s, with a 0.82 s lead.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.12 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 gagne (8,05 s vs 8,18 s).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,05 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 : 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 : 233 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 211 km/h.