Among the 42 S 2014–2018, the Aventador S ranks 4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 2nd of 42 in Top speed (350 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 3rd of 42 in Power-to-weight (470 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
LP740 · GENERATION 2016 → · SPORTS CAR
LamborghiniICE
Aventador S
740 hp, 2,9 s 0-100 : among the 42 S 2014–2018, the Aventador S ranks 4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 42 in Top speed, 3rd of 42 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
740hp
690 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
2.9s
VMax 350 km/h
Cons.
-L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Aventador S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 740 hp |
| Couple | 690 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 2,9 s |
| VMax | 350 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 2,030 mm |
| Height | 1,136 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,575 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 42 S, the Aventador S ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 2nd of 42 in Top speed (350 km/h), 3rd of 42 in Power-to-weight (470 hp/t). 4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 2nd of 42 in Top speed (350 km/h), 3rd of 42 in Power-to-weight (470 hp/t).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 2.9 s 0-100 (4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Aventador S ranks 4th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 350 km/h (2nd of 42 in Top speed)
Top speed of 350 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Aventador S stands against S
Comparison across 42 S marketed between 2014–2018.
0–100 km/h4e / 42
2,9 s
Min 4,8 s · Porsche Cayman SMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed2e / 42
350 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight3e / 42
470 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
911 Turbo S588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Aventador S
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Aventador S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 2.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Aventador S vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.