Among the 46 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 11th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 14th of 46 in Power-to-weight (343 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
991.2 · GENERATION 2017 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Turbo
547 hp, 3,0 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 46 in Top speed, 14th of 46 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
547hp
659 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.0s
VMax 319 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
67.758839L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 547 hp |
| Combined power | 547 hp |
| Combined torque | 659 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 67.758839 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,0 s |
| VMax | 319 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,507 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm |
| Height | 1,297 mm |
| Boot | 260 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,595 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 46 S, the 911 Turbo ranks (top 9 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s), 11th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h), 14th of 46 in Power-to-weight (343 hp/t). 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s), 11th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h), 14th of 46 in Power-to-weight (343 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.0 s 0-100 (9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 319 km/h (11th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 319 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Turbo stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2015–2019.
0–100 km/h9e / 46
3,0 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 CaymanMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed11e / 46
319 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight14e / 46
343 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Huracán EVO RWD610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Huracán LP 610-4610 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Huracán EVO639 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche 911 991.2 range
Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 991.2
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.0 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.