F92 · GENERATION 2021 · LIMOUSINE
BMWICE

M8 Competition Convertible

625 hp, 3,3 s 0-100 : among the 35 limousines 2019–2023, the M8 Competition Convertible ranks 5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 35 in Top speed, 2nd of 35 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,45415,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

625hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.3s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

11.4L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M8 Competition Convertible

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement4,395 cm\u00b3
Power625 hp
Couple750 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11,4 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,3 s
0 → 200 km/h11,30 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,867 mm
Wheelbase2,827 mm
Width1,907 mm
Height1,353 mm
Boot350 L
Kerb weight2,025 kg
Cd0.33
CO₂ WLTP262 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 35 limousines, the M8 Competition Convertible ranks (top 5 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 11th of 35 in Top speed (250 km/h), 2nd of 35 in Power-to-weight (309 hp/t). 5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 11th of 35 in Top speed (250 km/h), 2nd of 35 in Power-to-weight (309 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S Executive (1st with 315 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.3 s 0-100 (5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M8 Competition Convertible ranks 5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo (3.0 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (11th of 35 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 315 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M8 Competition Convertible stands against limousines

Comparison across 35 limousines marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h5e / 35
3,3 s
Min 5,5 s · Bmw 840i ConvertibleMax 3,0 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo
Top speed11e / 35
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw 840i xDrive Gran CoupeMax 315 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo S Executive
Power-to-weight2e / 35
309 hp/t
Min 167 hp/t · Bmw 840d xDrive ConvertibleMax 313 hp/t · Bmw M8 Competition Gran Coupe

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW M8 F92 range

Generation F92 launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F92

Compare

Popular duels involving the M8 Competition Convertible

Frequently asked questions

BMW M8 Competition Convertible: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 35 limousines 2019–2023, the M8 Competition Convertible ranks 5th of 35 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo), 11th of 35 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S Executive), 2nd of 35 in Power-to-weight (309 hp/t, behind the Bmw M8 Competition Gran Coupe).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.