2008 PureTech 130 EAT8
131 hp, 9,9 s 0-100 : among the 21 B-SUV 2020–2024, the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks 16th of 21 in Combined consumption, 13th of 17 in Tank range, 9th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
131hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.9s
VMax 208 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
44L
On this page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Peugeot 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,199 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 131 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,0 L/100km |
| Tank | 44 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,9 s |
| VMax | 208 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,290 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 136 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 21 B-SUV, the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (16th of 21 in Combined consumption)
The 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 733 km (13th of 17 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 covers 733 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1190 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 21 B-SUV marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption
16eout of 21
Tank range
13eout of 17
0–100 km/h
9eout of 21
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Captur TCe 130 EDC
131 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
HR-V e:HEV
129 hp · 0-100 9.6 s
Puma EcoBoost 125
125 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
HR-V
120 hp · 0-100 11.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Peugeot 2008 II range
Generation II launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Compare
Popular duels involving the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8
Take the next step
Find a 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Peugeot 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 21 B-SUV 2020–2024, the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks 16th of 21 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS), 13th of 17 in Tank range (733 km, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS), 9th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (9.9 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
733 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 13th of 17 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 vs Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.