Among the 14 B-SUV 2020–2024, the Countryman Cooper S FWD ranks 12th of 14 in Combined consumption (7.0 L/100, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 3rd of 14 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
F60 · GENERATION 2022 → · SMALL SUV
MINIICE
Countryman Cooper S FWD
192 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 14 B-SUV 2020–2024, the Countryman Cooper S FWD ranks 12th of 14 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
192hp
280 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.4s
VMax 228 km/h
Cons.
7.0L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications MINI Countryman Cooper S FWD
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 192 hp |
| Couple | 280 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,4 s |
| VMax | 228 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,845 mm |
| Height | 1,645 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,435 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 B-SUV, the Countryman Cooper S FWD ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
B-SUV among the best in segment: 3rd of 14 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford Puma ST 200 (1st with 6.7 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.0 L/100 L/100 (12th of 14 in Combined consumption)
The Countryman Cooper S FWD consumes 7.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (4.3 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Countryman Cooper S FWD stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 14 B-SUV marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption12e / 14
7 L/100
Min 7.3 L/100 · Hyundai Kona 1.6 T-GDI 7DCT 198 PSMax 4.3 L/100 · Ford Puma EcoBoost 125
0–100 km/h3e / 14
7,4 s
Min 12,0 s · MG MG ZS 1.5 VTi FWDMax 6,7 s · Ford Puma ST 200
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q2 40 TFSI quattro S tronic 140 kW190 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
2008 PureTech 130 EAT8131 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
Captur TCe 130 EDC131 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
Puma EcoBoost 125125 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full MINI Countryman F60 range
Generation F60 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F60
Compare
Popular duels involving the Countryman Cooper S FWD
Frequently asked questions
MINI Countryman Cooper S FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 7.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Countryman Cooper S FWD vs Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.