I · GENERATION 2015 · CITY CAR
PeugeotICE

208 GTi 30th 208

208 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 8 city cars 2013–2017, the 208 GTi 30th 208 ranks 6th of 8 in Combined consumption, 4th of 6 in Tank range, 1st of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,75415,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

208hp

300 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.5s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

6.8L

/100 km

Tank

50L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement1,598 cm\u00b3
Power208 hp
Couple300 Nm
GearboxMANUAL 6 rapports Manual
TransmissionFWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6,8 L/100km
Tank50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,5 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length3,963 mm
Wheelbase2,538 mm
Width1,739 mm
Height1,453 mm
Kerb weight1,163 kg
Cd0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 8 city cars, the 208 GTi 30th 208 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

city car among the best in segment: 1st of 8 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Honda Jazz e:HEV (1st with 4.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (1st with 900 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.8 L/100 L/100 (6th of 8 in Combined consumption)

The 208 GTi 30th 208 consumes 6.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Honda Jazz e:HEV (4.9 L/100).

Tank range: 735 km (4th of 6 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 208 GTi 30th 208 covers 735 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 900 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 208 GTi 30th 208 stands against city cars

Comparison across 8 city cars marketed between 2013–2017.

Combined consumption

6eout of 8

6.8 L/100
Min8.7 L/100 · Renault Clio 4 RS Trophy 220
Max4.9 L/100 · Honda Jazz e:HEV

Tank range

4eout of 6

735 km
Min517 km · Renault Clio 4 RS Trophy 220
Max900 km · Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG

0–100 km/h

1eout of 8

6,5 s
Min12,4 s · SEAT Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
Max6,5 s · Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Peugeot 208 I range

Generation I launched in 2012. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the I

Compare

Popular duels involving the 208 GTi 30th 208

Take the next step

Find a 208 GTi 30th 208 or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 208 GTi 30th 208 rank in its segment?#

Among the 8 city cars 2013–2017, the 208 GTi 30th 208 ranks 6th of 8 in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100, behind the Honda Jazz e:HEV), 4th of 6 in Tank range (735 km, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG), 1st of 8 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208).

What is the range of the 208 GTi 30th 208?#

735 km on a full tank (6.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 4th of 6 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 208 GTi 30th 208 cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Honda Jazz e:HEV instead?#

The Honda Jazz e:HEV leads in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100 vs 6.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 208 GTi 30th 208 vs Honda Jazz e:HEV duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.