991.1 · GENERATION 2015 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 Carrera GTS

480 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 34 S 2013–2017, the 911 Carrera GTS ranks 18th of 34 in 0–100 km/h, 18th of 34 in Top speed, 11th of 34 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,89015,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

480hp

570 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.9s

VMax 306 km/h

Cons.

11.2L

/100 km

Tank

63.973429L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 Carrera GTS

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Naturally Aspirated
Displacement3,800 cm\u00b3
Puissance thermique436 hp
Combined power480 hp
Couple570 Nm
GearboxDUAL_CLUTCH 7 rapports Automatic
TransmissionRWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11,2 L/100km
Tank63.973429 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,9 s
VMax306 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,509 mm
Wheelbase2,450 mm
Width1,852 mm
Height1,295 mm
Boot125 L
Kerb weight1,425 kg
Cd0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 34 S, the 911 Carrera GTS ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 11th of 34 in Power-to-weight (337 hp/t). 11th of 34 in Power-to-weight (337 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (18th of 34 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera GTS ranks 18th of 34 in 0–100 km/h, 1.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).

Top speed: 306 km/h (18th of 34 in Top speed)

Top speed of 306 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 Carrera GTS stands against S

Comparison across 34 S marketed between 2013–2017.

0–100 km/h

18eout of 34

3,9 s
Min4,8 s · Porsche 911 Carrera 4
Max2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35

Top speed

18eout of 34

306 km/h
Min282 km/h · Porsche Cayman S
Max350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S

Power-to-weight

11eout of 34

337 hp/t
Min242 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
Max524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera GTS

Take the next step

Find a 911 Carrera GTS or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 Carrera GTS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 911 Carrera GTS rank in its segment?#

Among the 34 S 2013–2017, the 911 Carrera GTS ranks 18th of 34 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 18th of 34 in Top speed (306 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 11th of 34 in Power-to-weight (337 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).

How much does the 911 Carrera GTS cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Nissan GT-R 570 R35 instead?#

The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera GTS vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.