Among the 14 S 2021–2025, the 2023 911 Sport Classic ranks 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s, behind the Lamborghini Huracán STO), 5th of 14 in Top speed (314 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Huracán Tecnica), 5th of 14 in Power-to-weight (350 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Huracán STO).
2023 911 Sport Classic
551 hp, 4,0 s 0-100 : among the 14 S 2021–2025, the 2023 911 Sport Classic ranks 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 14 in Top speed, 5th of 14 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
551hp
599 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.0s
VMax 314 km/h
Cons.
12.6L
/100 km
Tank
17.6L
Full specifications Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,745 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 551 hp |
| Combined power | 551 hp |
| Combined torque | 599 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 7 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 17.6 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,0 s |
| VMax | 314 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,535 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,900 mm |
| Height | 1,299 mm |
| Boot | 264 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,573 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 S, the 2023 911 Sport Classic ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 5th of 14 in Top speed (314 km/h), 5th of 14 in Power-to-weight (350 hp/t). 5th of 14 in Top speed (314 km/h), 5th of 14 in Power-to-weight (350 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,6 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Huracán STO (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Huracán Tecnica (1st with 325 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.0 s 0-100 (8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 2023 911 Sport Classic ranks 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Lamborghini Huracán STO (3.0 s).
Top speed: 314 km/h (5th of 14 in Top speed)
Top speed of 314 km/h. The segment reference reaches 325 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 2023 911 Sport Classic stands against S
Comparison across 14 S marketed between 2021–2025.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche 911 992 range
Generation 992 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 992
Popular duels involving the 2023 911 Sport Classic
Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Huracán STO leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 4.0 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 2023 911 Sport Classic vs Lamborghini Huracán STO duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.