958.1 · GENERATION 2011 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

400 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 14 E-SUV 2009–2013, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 14 in Top speed, 8th of 14 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,90915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

400hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

5.7s

VMax 258 km/h

Cons.

12.9L

/100 km

Tank

84.793184L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 8 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement4,806 cm³
Puissance thermique406 hp
Combined power400 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12.9 L/100km
Tank84.793184 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,7 s
VMax258 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,895 mm
Width1,939 mm
Height1,705 mm
Boot671 L
Kerb weight2,065 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 14 E-SUV, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks (top 5 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s), 5th of 14 in Top speed (258 km/h). 5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s), 5th of 14 in Top speed (258 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo (1st with 4.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo (1st with 278 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 1.2 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo (4.5 s).

Top speed: 258 km/h (5th of 14 in Top speed)

Top speed of 258 km/h. The segment reference reaches 278 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 14 E-SUV marketed between 2009–2013.

0–100 km/h5e / 14
5,7 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 4,5 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Top speed5e / 14
258 km/h
Min 230 km/h · Porsche Cayenne (6-speed manual)Max 278 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Power-to-weight8e / 14
194 hp/t
Min 150 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 240 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S): what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 14 E-SUV 2009–2013, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 5th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo), 5th of 14 in Top speed (258 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo), 8th of 14 in Power-to-weight (194 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.