Among the 5 E-SUV hybrid 2009–2013, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks 5th of 5 in Combined consumption (10.9 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid), 5th of 5 in Tank range (779 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid), 4th of 5 in 0–100 km/h (6.2 s, behind the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6).
Cayenne S Hybrid
385 hp, 6,2 s 0-100 : among the 5 E-SUV hybrid 2009–2013, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks 5th of 5 in Combined consumption, 5th of 5 in Tank range, 4th of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
385hp
579 Nm · 47 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.2s
VMax 242 km/h
Cons.
10.9L
/100 km
Tank
84.793184L
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 338 hp |
| Puissance électrique | 47 hp |
| Combined power | 385 hp |
| Combined torque | 579 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 84.793184 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,2 s |
| VMax | 242 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,895 mm |
| Width | 1,939 mm |
| Height | 1,705 mm |
| Boot | 580 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,240 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 5 E-SUV hybrid, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (1st with 3.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (1st with 2241 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 10.9 L/100 L/100 (5th of 5 in Combined consumption)
The Cayenne S Hybrid consumes 10.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (3.8 L/100).
Tank range: 779 km (5th of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cayenne S Hybrid covers 779 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 2241 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Cayenne S Hybrid stands against E-SUV hybrid
Comparison across 5 E-SUV hybrid marketed between 2009–2013.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S Hybrid
Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
779 km on a full tank (10.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 5 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid leads in Combined consumption (3.8 L/100 vs 10.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S Hybrid vs Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.