Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
G05 · GENERATION 2021 → · LARGE SUV
BMWPHEV
X5 xDrive45e
Power
394hp
600 Nm · 113 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
5.6s
VMax 235 km/h
Total range
—
Battery + Tank
22.3kWh
+ 69 L tank
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X5 xDrive45e
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,998 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 113 hp |
| Combined power | 394 hp |
| Couple | 600 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 22.3 kWh |
| Charge AC max | 3.7 kW |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 2.1 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 9.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 69 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,6 s |
| VMax | 235 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,922 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,745 mm |
| Boot | 500 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,435 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 47 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
E-SUV plug-in hybrid among the best in segment: 1st of 7 in Combined range (730 km), 2nd of 6 in Thermal cons. estimated (9.4 L/100).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Thermal cons. estimated, the Volvo XC90 T8 AWD Recharge (1st with 8.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid Coupe (1st with 3.7 s) takes the lead.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X5 xDrive45e stands against E-SUV plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 7 E-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined range1e / 7
730 km
Min 46 km · Volkswagen Touareg RMax 730 km · Bmw X5 xDrive45e
Thermal cons. estimated2e / 6
9.45 L/100
Min 10.81 L/100 · Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xeMax 8.71 L/100 · Volvo XC90 T8 AWD Recharge
0–100 km/h5e / 7
5,6 s
Min 6,1 s · Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xeMax 3,7 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid Coupe
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV394 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Q8 SUV394 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Cayenne S Hybrid385 hp · 0-100 6.2 s
Cayenne S Hybrid385 hp · 0-100 6.2 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X5 G05 range
Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G05
Compare
Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive45e
Frequently asked questions
BMW X5 xDrive45e: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.