Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid
385 hp, 6,2 s 0-100 : among the 4 E-SUV hybrid 2010–2014, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h, behind the only Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 385 hp
- 579 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.2 s
- VMax 242 km/h
- Cons.
- 10.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 84.793184 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- Atmosphérique
- Displacement
- 2,995 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 385 hp
- Combined power
- 385 hp
- Combined torque
- 579 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 10.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 84.793184 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,2 s
- VMax
- 242 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,846 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,896 mm
- Width
- 1,938 mm
- Height
- 1,712 mm
- Boot
- 60 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,240 kg
- Cd
- 0.36
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 4 E-SUV hybrid, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. Combined consumption (10.2 L/100), Tank range (831 km), 0–100 km/h (6.2 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (1st with 3.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (1st with 2241 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 10.2 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The Cayenne S Hybrid consumes 10.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid (3.8 L/100).
Tank range: 831 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cayenne S Hybrid covers 831 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 2241 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Cayenne S Hybrid stands against E-SUV hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S Hybrid
Continue with the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Cayenne S Hybrid rank in its segment?
Among the 4 E-SUV hybrid 2010–2014, the Cayenne S Hybrid ranks Combined consumption (10.2 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid), Tank range (831 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid), 0–100 km/h (6.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid).
What is the range of the Cayenne S Hybrid?
831 km on a full tank (10.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - autonomie du segment.
How much does the Cayenne S Hybrid cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid instead?
The Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid leads in Combined consumption (3.8 L/100 vs 10.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S Hybrid vs Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.