SEAT Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
90 hp, 12,4 s 0-100 : among the 8 city cars 2014–2018, the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG ranks 2nd of 7 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 6 in Tank range, 8th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 90 hp
- 160 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 12.4 s
- VMax 178 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 45 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 3 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,197 cm³
- Power
- 90 hp
- Couple
- 160 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 45 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 12,4 s
- VMax
- 178 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 1,095 kg
- Cd
- 0.33
- CO₂ WLTP
- 120 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 8 city cars, the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 7 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100), 2nd of 6 in Tank range (865 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (1st with 5.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (1st with 900 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.2 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 7 in Combined consumption)
The Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG consumes 5.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (5.0 L/100).
Tank range: 865 km (2nd of 6 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG covers 865 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 900 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG stands against city cars
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
Continue with the SEAT Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
The same car, from other angles.
SEAT Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG rank in its segment?
Among the 8 city cars 2014–2018, the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG ranks 2nd of 7 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG), 2nd of 6 in Tank range (865 km, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG), 8th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (12.4 s, behind the Toyota Yaris GRMN).
What is the range of the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG?
865 km on a full tank (5.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 6 in Tank range.
How much does the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG instead?
The Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100 vs 5.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG vs Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.