BMW X5 xDrive30d

Gazole mild-hybridlarge SUVGENERATION G05, 2020

286 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 10 E-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 5th of 10 in Combined consumption, 5th of 10 in Tank range, 10th of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
286 hp
650 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.1 s
VMax 235 km/h
Cons.
6.2 L
/100 km
Tank
80 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
6 cyl.
Displacement
2,993 cm³
Electric power
11 hp
Combined power
286 hp
Couple
650 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
6.2 L/100 km
Tank
80 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
6,1 s
VMax
235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,922 mm
Wheelbase
2,975 mm
Width
2,004 mm
Height
1,745 mm
Boot
650 L
Kerb weight
2,190 kg
Cd
0.32
CO₂ WLTP
164 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 10 E-SUV hybrid, the X5 xDrive30d ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X5 xDrive30d (1st with 6.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X5 xDrive30d (1st with 1290 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.2 L/100 L/100 (5th of 10 in Combined consumption)

The X5 xDrive30d consumes 6.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X5 xDrive30d (6.2 L/100).

Tank range: 1290 km (5th of 10 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X5 xDrive30d covers 1290 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1290 km.

Where the X5 xDrive30d stands against E-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 10 E-SUV hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption5e / 10
6.2 L/100
Min 8.4 L/100 · BMW X5 xDrive40iMax 6.2 L/100 · BMW X5 xDrive30d
Tank range5e / 10
1 290 km
Min 988 km · BMW X5 xDrive40iMax 1 290 km · BMW X5 xDrive30d
0–100 km/h10e / 10
6,1 s
Min 6,1 s · BMW X5 xDrive30dMax 5,5 s · BMW X5 xDrive40d

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW X5 G05 range

Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G05

Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive30d

Continue with the BMW X5 xDrive30d

The same car, from other angles.

BMW X5 xDrive30d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X5 xDrive30d rank in its segment?

Among the 10 E-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 5th of 10 in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100, behind the BMW X5 xDrive30d), 5th of 10 in Tank range (1290 km, behind the BMW X5 xDrive30d), 10th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the BMW X5 xDrive40d).

What is the range of the X5 xDrive30d?

1290 km on a full tank (6.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 10 in Tank range.

How much does the X5 xDrive30d cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW X5 xDrive30d instead?

The BMW X5 xDrive30d leads in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100 vs 6.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 xDrive30d vs BMW X5 xDrive30d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.