BMW 320d xDrive Touring

DieselsaloonGENERATION G20, 2019

190 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 17th of 83 in Combined consumption, 54th of 75 in Tank range, 57th of 83 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
190 hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.4 s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
4.9 L
/100 km
Tank
40 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
4 cyl.
Displacement
1,995 cm³
Power
190 hp
Couple
400 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
4.9 L/100 km
Tank
40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,4 s
VMax
225 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,709 mm
Wheelbase
2,851 mm
Width
1,827 mm
Height
1,445 mm
Boot
500 L
Kerb weight
1,640 kg
Cd
0.27
CO₂ WLTP
129 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 83 saloons, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks (top 17 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 17th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.9 L/100 L/100 (17th of 83 in Combined consumption)

The 320d xDrive Touring consumes 4.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 816 km (54th of 75 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320d xDrive Touring covers 816 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.

Where the 320d xDrive Touring stands against saloons

Comparison across 83 saloons marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption17e / 83
4.9 L/100
Min 12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 4.2 L/100 · BMW 420d
Tank range54e / 75
816 km
Min 480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 1 405 km · BMW 420d
0–100 km/h57e / 83
7,4 s
Min 8,9 s · BMW 318d TouringMax 3,9 s · BMW M4 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive Touring

Continue with the BMW 320d xDrive Touring

The same car, from other angles.

BMW 320d xDrive Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 320d xDrive Touring rank in its segment?

Among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 17th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 54th of 75 in Tank range (816 km, behind the BMW 420d), 57th of 83 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition).

What is the range of the 320d xDrive Touring?

816 km on a full tank (4.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 54th of 75 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 320d xDrive Touring cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW 420d instead?

The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive Touring vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.