G22 · GENERATION 2024 · SALOON
BMWICE

420i Gran Coupé

184 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 37 saloons 2022–2026, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks 11th of 37 in Combined consumption, 8th of 28 in Tank range, 33th of 37 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,97015,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

184hp

300 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.9s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

6.5L

/100 km

Tank

59L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 420i Gran Coupé

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,998 cm³
Power184 hp
Couple300 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.5 L/100km
Tank59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,9 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,783 mm
Wheelbase2,856 mm
Width1,852 mm
Height1,442 mm
Boot470 L
Kerb weight1,620 kg
Cd0.26

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 37 saloons, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks (top 11 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

saloon among the best in segment: 11th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100), 8th of 28 in Tank range (908 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A5 Sedan (1st with 1091 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.5 L/100 L/100 (11th of 37 in Combined consumption)

The 420i Gran Coupé consumes 6.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 908 km (8th of 28 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 420i Gran Coupé covers 908 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1091 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 420i Gran Coupé stands against saloons

Comparison across 37 saloons marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption11e / 37
6.5 L/100
Min 14.9 L/100 · Lexus IS 500 F Sport RWDMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 320d
Tank range8e / 28
908 km
Min 500 km · Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWDMax 1 091 km · Audi A5 Sedan
0–100 km/h33e / 37
7,9 s
Min 9,8 s · Audi A5 AvantMax 3,5 s · Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 4 Series G22 range

Generation G22 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G22

Compare

Popular duels involving the 420i Gran Coupé

Frequently asked questions

BMW 420i Gran Coupé: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 37 saloons 2022–2026, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks 11th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 8th of 28 in Tank range (908 km, behind the Audi A5 Sedan), 33th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive).

908 km on a full tank (6.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 8th of 28 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 420i Gran Coupé vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.