BMW 420i Gran Coupé
184 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 37 saloons 2022–2026, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks 11th of 37 in Combined consumption, 8th of 28 in Tank range, 33th of 37 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 184 hp
- 300 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.9 s
- VMax 235 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 184 hp
- Couple
- 300 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,9 s
- VMax
- 235 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,783 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,856 mm
- Width
- 1,852 mm
- Height
- 1,442 mm
- Boot
- 470 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,620 kg
- Cd
- 0.26
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 37 saloons, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks (top 11 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
saloon among the best in segment: 11th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100), 8th of 28 in Tank range (908 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 320d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A5 Sedan (1st with 1091 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.5 L/100 L/100 (11th of 37 in Combined consumption)
The 420i Gran Coupé consumes 6.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 320d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 908 km (8th of 28 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 420i Gran Coupé covers 908 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1091 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 420i Gran Coupé stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 4 Series G22 range
Generation G22 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G22
Popular duels involving the 420i Gran Coupé
Continue with the BMW 420i Gran Coupé
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 420i Gran Coupé: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 420i Gran Coupé rank in its segment?
Among the 37 saloons 2022–2026, the 420i Gran Coupé ranks 11th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100, behind the BMW 320d), 8th of 28 in Tank range (908 km, behind the Audi A5 Sedan), 33th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive).
What is the range of the 420i Gran Coupé?
908 km on a full tank (6.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 8th of 28 in Tank range.
How much does the 420i Gran Coupé cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 320d instead?
The BMW 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 420i Gran Coupé vs BMW 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.