420i xDrive Gran Coupe
184 hp, 8,1 s 0-100 : among the 85 saloons 2019–2023, the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe ranks 53th of 85 in Combined consumption, 39th of 73 in Tank range, 77th of 85 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
270 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.1s
VMax 231 km/h
Cons.
6.7L
/100 km
Tank
60L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 420i xDrive Gran Coupe
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 270 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,7 L/100km |
| Tank | 60 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,1 s |
| VMax | 231 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,640 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,810 mm |
| Width | 1,825 mm |
| Height | 1,404 mm |
| Boot | 480 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,630 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 153 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 85 saloons, the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.7 L/100 L/100 (53th of 85 in Combined consumption)
The 420i xDrive Gran Coupe consumes 6.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 896 km (39th of 73 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe covers 896 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe stands against saloons
Comparison across 85 saloons marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption
53eout of 85
Tank range
39eout of 73
0–100 km/h
77eout of 85
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A4 40 TFSI
190 hp · 0-100 7.3 s
A5 Avant
204 hp · 0-100 7.8 s
A5 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW
204 hp · 0-100 7.6 s
A5 Sedan
204 hp · 0-100 7.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 4 Series G22 range
Generation G22 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G22
Compare
Popular duels involving the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe
Take the next step
Find a 420i xDrive Gran Coupe or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 420i xDrive Gran Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 85 saloons 2019–2023, the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe ranks 53th of 85 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 39th of 73 in Tank range (896 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 77th of 85 in 0–100 km/h (8.1 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
896 km on a full tank (6.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 39th of 73 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 6.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 420i xDrive Gran Coupe vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.