Among the 16 saloons 2016–2020, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 14th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (287 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
BMW M4 Competition Coupe
450 hp, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 16 saloons 2016–2020, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 14th of 16 in Top speed, 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
450hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.2s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
10.0L
/100 km
Tank
60L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,979 cm³
- Power
- 450 hp
- Couple
- 550 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 10.0 L/100 km
- Tank
- 60 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,2 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,671 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,812 mm
- Width
- 1,870 mm
- Height
- 1,392 mm
- Boot
- 445 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,570 kg
- Cd
- 0.34
- CO₂ WLTP
- 227 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 16 saloons, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (287 hp/t). 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (287 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 307 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.2 s 0-100 (6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 6th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (3.9 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (14th of 16 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the M4 Competition Coupe stands against saloons
Comparison across 16 saloons marketed between 2016–2020.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW M4 F82 range
Generation F82 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F82
Popular duels involving the M4 Competition Coupe
BMW M4 Competition Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 4.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M4 Competition Coupe vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.