Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 ranks 8th of 9 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 7th of 9 in Tank range (800 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 8th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (11.0 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).
Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100
101 hp, 11,0 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 ranks 8th of 9 in Combined consumption, 7th of 9 in Tank range, 8th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
101hp
205 Nm · 16 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
11.0s
VMax 185 km/h
Cons.
5.5L
/100 km
Tank
44L
Full specifications Fiat Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,199 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 16 hp |
| Combined power | 101 hp |
| Couple | 205 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 44 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,0 s |
| VMax | 185 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,350 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 125 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (8th of 9 in Combined consumption)
The Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 800 km (7th of 9 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 covers 800 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 stands against city cars hybrid
Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100
Fiat Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
800 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 7th of 9 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100 vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.