Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch
136 hp, 9,9 s 0-100 : among the 6 B-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch ranks 1st of 6 in Combined consumption, 1st of 5 in Tank range, 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 136 hp
- 280 Nm, dont 48 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.9 s
- VMax 190 km/h
- Cons.
- 4.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,580 cm³
- Puissance électrique
- 48 hp
- Combined power
- 136 hp
- Couple
- 280 Nm
- Gearbox
- 7 rapports
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,9 s
- VMax
- 190 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,205 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,600 mm
- Width
- 1,800 mm
- Height
- 1,500 mm
- Boot
- 374 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,445 kg
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 6 B-SUV hybrid, the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 6 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100), 1st of 5 in Tank range (1190 km), 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (9.9 s).
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Honda HR-V e:HEV (1st with 9.6 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.2 L/100 L/100 (1st of 6 in Combined consumption)
The Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch consumes 4.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1190 km (1st of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch covers 1190 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1190 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch stands against B-SUV hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai Kona OS range
Generation OS launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the OS
Popular duels involving the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch
Continue with the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch
The same car, from other angles.
Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch rank in its segment?
Among the 6 B-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch ranks 1st of 6 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch), 1st of 5 in Tank range (1190 km, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch), 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (9.9 s, behind the Honda HR-V e:HEV).
What is the range of the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch?
1190 km on a full tank (4.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 5 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 ch cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.