Among the 18 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS ranks 9th of 18 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS), 6th of 15 in Tank range (909 km, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS), 15th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (11.0 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS
120 hp, 11,0 s 0-100 : among the 18 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS ranks 9th of 18 in Combined consumption, 6th of 15 in Tank range, 15th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
120hp
172 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
11.0s
VMax 182 km/h
Cons.
5.5L
/100 km
Tank
50L
Full specifications Hyundai Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 120 hp |
| Couple | 172 Nm |
| Transmission | Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,0 s |
| VMax | 182 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,205 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,500 mm |
| Boot | 374 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,267 kg |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 18 B-SUV, the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (1st with 1190 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (9th of 18 in Combined consumption)
The Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 909 km (6th of 15 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS covers 909 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1190 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 18 B-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai Kona OS range
Generation OS launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the OS
Popular duels involving the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS
Hyundai Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
909 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 6th of 15 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Kona 1.0 T-GDI 7DCT 120 PS vs Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.