KIA Sportage HEV AWD

Essence hybridecompact SUVGENERATION NQ5, 2024

230 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 6 C-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks 6th of 6 in Combined consumption, 4th of 5 in Tank range, 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
230 hp
350 Nm, dont 67 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.7 s
VMax 193 km/h
Cons.
5.5 L
/100 km
Tank
52 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Electric power
67 hp
Combined power
230 hp
Couple
350 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.5 L/100 km
Tank
52 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,7 s
VMax
193 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width
1,845 mm
Height
1,645 mm
Kerb weight
1,680 kg
Cd
0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 6 C-SUV hybrid, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X2 sDrive20d (1st with 1059 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (6th of 6 in Combined consumption)

The Sportage HEV AWD consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 945 km (4th of 5 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Sportage HEV AWD covers 945 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1059 km.

Where the Sportage HEV AWD stands against C-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 6 C-SUV hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption6e / 6
5.5 L/100
Min 5.5 L/100 · Kia Sportage HEV AWDMax 4.8 L/100 · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Tank range4e / 5
945 km
Min 875 km · Kia Niro HEV FWDMax 1 059 km · BMW X2 sDrive20d
0–100 km/h1e / 6
7,7 s
Min 11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWDMax 7,7 s · Kia Sportage HEV AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the Sportage HEV AWD

Continue with the KIA Sportage HEV AWD

The same car, from other angles.

Kia Sportage HEV AWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Sportage HEV AWD rank in its segment?

Among the 6 C-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks 6th of 6 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 4th of 5 in Tank range (945 km, behind the BMW X2 sDrive20d), 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Kia Sportage HEV AWD).

What is the range of the Sportage HEV AWD?

945 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 5 in Tank range.

How much does the Sportage HEV AWD cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Kia Niro HEV FWD instead?

The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Sportage HEV AWD vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.