KIA Sportage HEV AWD
230 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 6 C-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks 6th of 6 in Combined consumption, 4th of 5 in Tank range, 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 230 hp
- 350 Nm, dont 67 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.7 s
- VMax 193 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 52 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Electric power
- 67 hp
- Combined power
- 230 hp
- Couple
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 52 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,7 s
- VMax
- 193 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Width
- 1,845 mm
- Height
- 1,645 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,680 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 6 C-SUV hybrid, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X2 sDrive20d (1st with 1059 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (6th of 6 in Combined consumption)
The Sportage HEV AWD consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).
Tank range: 945 km (4th of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Sportage HEV AWD covers 945 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1059 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Sportage HEV AWD stands against C-SUV hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Sportage HEV AWD
Continue with the KIA Sportage HEV AWD
The same car, from other angles.
Kia Sportage HEV AWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Sportage HEV AWD rank in its segment?
Among the 6 C-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the Sportage HEV AWD ranks 6th of 6 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 4th of 5 in Tank range (945 km, behind the BMW X2 sDrive20d), 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Kia Sportage HEV AWD).
What is the range of the Sportage HEV AWD?
945 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 5 in Tank range.
How much does the Sportage HEV AWD cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Kia Niro HEV FWD instead?
The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Sportage HEV AWD vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.