991.1 · GENERATION 2015 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 Turbo Cabriolet

520 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 42 in Top speed, 19th of 42 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,57515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

520hp

660 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.2s

VMax 318 km/h

Cons.

11.8L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement3,800 cm³
Puissance thermique527 hp
Combined power520 hp
Couple660 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11.8 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,2 s
VMax318 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,506 mm
Wheelbase2,450 mm
Width1,880 mm
Height1,292 mm
Boot226 L
Kerb weight1,665 kg
Cd0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 42 S, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks (top 12 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h). 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).

Top speed: 318 km/h (11th of 42 in Top speed)

Top speed of 318 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 Turbo Cabriolet stands against S

Comparison across 42 S marketed between 2013–2017.

0–100 km/h12e / 42
3,2 s
Min 5,1 s · Porsche 911 Targa 4Max 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed11e / 42
318 km/h
Min 274 km/h · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight19e / 42
312 hp/t
Min 225 hp/t · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo Cabriolet

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 19th of 42 in Power-to-weight (312 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.