Among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 19th of 42 in Power-to-weight (312 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
911 Turbo Cabriolet
520 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 42 in Top speed, 19th of 42 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
520hp
660 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.2s
VMax 318 km/h
Cons.
11.8L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 527 hp |
| Combined power | 520 hp |
| Couple | 660 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.8 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,2 s |
| VMax | 318 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,506 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm |
| Height | 1,292 mm |
| Boot | 226 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,665 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 42 S, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks (top 12 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h). 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 11th of 42 in Top speed (318 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 318 km/h (11th of 42 in Top speed)
Top speed of 318 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 911 Turbo Cabriolet stands against S
Comparison across 42 S marketed between 2013–2017.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo Cabriolet vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.