Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet
560 hp, 2,9 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 33 in Top speed, 12th of 33 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 560 hp
- 750 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 2.9 s
- VMax 318 km/h
- Cons.
- 11.8 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- Boxer · 6 cyl. · Turbo
- Displacement
- 3,800 cm³
- ICE power
- 568 hp
- Combined power
- 560 hp
- Couple
- 750 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 11.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 2,9 s
- VMax
- 318 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,506 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,450 mm
- Width
- 1,880 mm
- Height
- 1,292 mm
- Boot
- 435 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,676 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 33 S, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (318 km/h). 4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (318 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 2.9 s 0-100 (4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 318 km/h (10th of 33 in Top speed)
Top speed of 318 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet stands against S
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet
Continue with the Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet rank in its segment?
Among the 33 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 10th of 33 in Top speed (318 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 12th of 33 in Power-to-weight (334 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
How much does the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Nissan GT-R 570 R35 instead?
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 2.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.