Among the 46 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 12th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 19th of 46 in Power-to-weight (329 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
911 Turbo Cabriolet
547 hp, 3,1 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 12th of 46 in Top speed, 19th of 46 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
547hp
659 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.1s
VMax 319 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
67.758839L
Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 547 hp |
| Combined power | 547 hp |
| Combined torque | 659 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 67.758839 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,1 s |
| VMax | 319 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,507 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm |
| Height | 1,294 mm |
| Boot | 160 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,665 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 46 S, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks (top 14 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 12th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h). 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 12th of 46 in Top speed (319 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.1 s 0-100 (14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo Cabriolet ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 319 km/h (12th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 319 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 911 Turbo Cabriolet stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2015–2019.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche 911 991.2 range
Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 991.2
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo Cabriolet vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.