Among the 29 S 2008–2012, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 4th of 29 in Top speed (312 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 6th of 29 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
911 Turbo S Cabriolet
537 hp, 3,3 s 0-100 : among the 29 S 2008–2012, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 29 in Top speed, 6th of 29 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
537hp
700 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.3s
VMax 312 km/h
Cons.
12.5L
/100 km
Tank
67.001757L
Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 537 hp |
| Combined power | 537 hp |
| Combined torque | 700 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 67.001757 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,3 s |
| VMax | 312 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,477 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,350 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,300 mm |
| Boot | 190 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,660 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 29 S, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 4th of 29 in Top speed (312 km/h), 6th of 29 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t). 4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 4th of 29 in Top speed (312 km/h), 6th of 29 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.3 s 0-100 (4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet ranks 4th of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 312 km/h (4th of 29 in Top speed)
Top speed of 312 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet stands against S
Comparison across 29 S marketed between 2008–2012.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet
Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 3.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo S Cabriolet vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.