Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 5th of 9 in Tank range (929 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 4th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (9.1 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).
Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145
143 hp, 9,1 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption, 5th of 9 in Tank range, 4th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
143hp
205 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.1s
VMax 180 km/h
Cons.
4.2L
/100 km
Tank
39L
Full specifications Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Electric · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,598 cm³ |
| Power | 143 hp |
| Couple | 205 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 4 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 39 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,1 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,050 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,583 mm |
| Width | 1,798 mm |
| Height | 1,440 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,340 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.2 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 9 in Combined consumption)
The Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 consumes 4.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 929 km (5th of 9 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 covers 929 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 stands against city cars hybrid
Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Renault Clio V range
Generation V launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the V
Popular duels involving the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145
Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
929 km on a full tank (4.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 5th of 9 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 4.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.