V · GENERATION 2024 · CITY CAR
RenaultHEV

Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145

143 hp, 9,1 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption, 5th of 9 in Tank range, 4th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,27315,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

143hp

205 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.1s

VMax 180 km/h

Cons.

4.2L

/100 km

Tank

39L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureElectric · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,598 cm³
Power143 hp
Couple205 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 4 rapports Automatique
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.2 L/100km
Tank39 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,1 s
VMax180 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,050 mm
Wheelbase2,583 mm
Width1,798 mm
Height1,440 mm
Kerb weight1,340 kg
Cd0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.2 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 9 in Combined consumption)

The Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 consumes 4.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 929 km (5th of 9 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 covers 929 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 stands against city cars hybrid

Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption2e / 9
4.2 L/100
Min 5.8 L/100 · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 3.9 L/100 · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Tank range5e / 9
929 km
Min 690 km · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 1 051 km · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
0–100 km/h4e / 9
9,1 s
Min 11,4 s · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 8,0 s · Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Renault Clio V range

Generation V launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the V

Compare

Popular duels involving the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145

Frequently asked questions

Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2022–2026, the Clio 5 E-Tech Full Hybrid 145 ranks 2nd of 9 in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 5th of 9 in Tank range (929 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 4th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (9.1 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).

929 km on a full tank (4.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 9 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.