II · GENERATION 2025 · CITY CAR
PeugeotHEV

208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6

136 hp, 8,1 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks 4th of 9 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 9 in Tank range, 2nd of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,37915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

136hp

230 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

8.1s

VMax 210 km/h

Cons.

4.5L

/100 km

Tank

44L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Peugeot 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureElectric · 3 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement1,199 cm³
Power136 hp
Couple230 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 6 rapports Automatique
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.5 L/100km
Tank44 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h8,1 s
VMax210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,055 mm
Wheelbase2,540 mm
Width1,745 mm
Height1,430 mm
Kerb weight1,228 kg
Cd0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 9 in Tank range (967 km), 2nd of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.1 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 9 in Combined consumption)

The 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 967 km (2nd of 9 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 covers 967 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 stands against city cars hybrid

Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.

Combined consumption4e / 9
4.55 L/100
Min 5.8 L/100 · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 3.9 L/100 · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Tank range2e / 9
967 km
Min 690 km · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 1 051 km · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
0–100 km/h2e / 9
8,1 s
Min 11,4 s · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 8,0 s · Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Peugeot 208 II range

Generation II launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the II

Compare

Popular duels involving the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6

Frequently asked questions

Peugeot 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks 4th of 9 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 2nd of 9 in Tank range (967 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 2nd of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.1 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).

967 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 9 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.