Among the 23 city cars 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks 4th of 22 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 2nd of 20 in Tank range (967 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 5th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (8.1 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6
136 hp, 8,1 s 0-100 : among the 23 city cars 2023–2027, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks 4th of 22 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 20 in Tank range, 5th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
136hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.1s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
4.5L
/100 km
Tank
44L
Full specifications Peugeot 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Electric · 3 cyl. · Turbocharged |
| Displacement | 1,199 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 136 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH 6 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 44 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,1 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,055 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm |
| Height | 1,430 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,228 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 23 city cars, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 22 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100), 2nd of 20 in Tank range (967 km), 5th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (8.1 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 1051 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 22 in Combined consumption)
The 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 967 km (2nd of 20 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 covers 967 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 stands against city cars
Comparison across 23 city cars marketed between 2023–2027.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot 208 II range
Generation II launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Popular duels involving the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6
Peugeot 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
967 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 2nd of 20 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 208 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.