Among the 14 B-SUV 2020–2024, the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks 4th of 14 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 10th of 12 in Tank range (714 km, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (10.5 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
I · GENERATION 2022 → · SMALL SUV
SEATICE
Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
110 hp, 10,5 s 0-100 : among the 14 B-SUV 2020–2024, the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks 4th of 14 in Combined consumption, 10th of 12 in Tank range, 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
110hp
200 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
10.5s
VMax 192 km/h
Cons.
5.6L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Technical identity card
Full specifications SEAT Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 999 cm³ |
| Power | 110 hp |
| Couple | 200 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 10,5 s |
| VMax | 192 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,210 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 128 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 B-SUV, the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 14 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (1st with 977 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (4th of 14 in Combined consumption)
The Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 714 km (10th of 12 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG covers 714 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 977 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 14 B-SUV marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption4e / 14
5.6 L/100
Min 7.3 L/100 · Hyundai Kona 1.6 T-GDI 7DCT 198 PSMax 4.3 L/100 · Ford Puma EcoBoost 125
Tank range10e / 12
714 km
Min 652 km · MG MG ZS 1.5 VTi FWDMax 977 km · Ford Puma EcoBoost 125
0–100 km/h10e / 14
10,5 s
Min 12,0 s · MG MG ZS 1.5 VTi FWDMax 6,7 s · Ford Puma ST 200
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
2008 PureTech 110110 hp · 0-100 10.9 s
HR-V120 hp · 0-100 11.0 s
Puma EcoBoost 125125 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
2008 PureTech 130 EAT8131 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Frequently asked questions
SEAT Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
714 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 10th of 12 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Arona 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG vs Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.