SEAT Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
110 hp, 10,3 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2021–2025, the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks 2nd of 11 in Combined consumption, 4th of 7 in Tank range, 9th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 110 hp
- 200 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 10.3 s
- VMax 198 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 3 cyl.
- Displacement
- 999 cm³
- Power
- 110 hp
- Couple
- 200 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 10,3 s
- VMax
- 198 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 1,145 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
- CO₂ WLTP
- 116 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 city cars, the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 11 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 11 in Combined consumption)
The Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 784 km (4th of 7 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG covers 784 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG stands against city cars
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Continue with the SEAT Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
The same car, from other angles.
SEAT Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG rank in its segment?
Among the 14 city cars 2021–2025, the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG ranks 2nd of 11 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 4th of 7 in Tank range (784 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 9th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (10.3 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
What is the range of the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG?
784 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 7 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG instead?
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Ibiza 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.