Among the 29 saloons 2020–2024, the M3 Competition xDrive ranks 3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive), 25th of 29 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 9th of 29 in Power-to-weight (291 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
M3 Competition xDrive
510 hp, 3,5 s 0-100 : among the 29 saloons 2020–2024, the M3 Competition xDrive ranks 3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 25th of 29 in Top speed, 9th of 29 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
510hp
650 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.5s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
10.7L
/100 km
Tank
59L
Full specifications BMW M3 Competition xDrive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 2,993 cm³ |
| Power | 510 hp |
| Couple | 650 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 59 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,5 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,794 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,857 mm |
| Width | 1,903 mm |
| Height | 1,433 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,750 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 243 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 29 saloons, the M3 Competition xDrive ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s), 9th of 29 in Power-to-weight (291 hp/t). 3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s), 9th of 29 in Power-to-weight (291 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 307 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.5 s 0-100 (3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M3 Competition xDrive ranks 3rd of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive (3.5 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (25th of 29 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the M3 Competition xDrive stands against saloons
Comparison across 29 saloons marketed between 2020–2024.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW M3 G80 range
Generation G80 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G80
Popular duels involving the M3 Competition xDrive
BMW M3 Competition xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 3.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M3 Competition xDrive vs Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.