Among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 318i Touring ranks 41th of 88 in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 29th of 77 in Tank range (952 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 87th of 88 in 0–100 km/h (8.7 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
G20 · GENERATION 2020 → · SALOON
BMWICE
318i Touring
156 hp, 8,7 s 0-100 : among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 318i Touring ranks 41th of 88 in Combined consumption, 29th of 77 in Tank range, 87th of 88 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
250 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.7s
VMax 220 km/h
Cons.
6.2L
/100 km
Tank
59L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 318i Touring
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 250 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 59 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,7 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,440 mm |
| Boot | 500 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,570 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 140 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 88 saloons, the 318i Touring ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.2 L/100 L/100 (41th of 88 in Combined consumption)
The 318i Touring consumes 6.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 952 km (29th of 77 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 318i Touring covers 952 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 318i Touring stands against saloons
Comparison across 88 saloons marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption41e / 88
6.2 L/100
Min 12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d
Tank range29e / 77
952 km
Min 480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 1 405 km · Bmw 420d
0–100 km/h87e / 88
8,7 s
Min 8,9 s · Bmw 318d TouringMax 3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A5 Avant150 hp · 0-100 9.8 s
A5 Sedan150 hp · 0-100 9.8 s
A4 40 TFSI190 hp · 0-100 7.3 s
A5 Avant204 hp · 0-100 7.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Compare
Popular duels involving the 318i Touring
Frequently asked questions
BMW 318i Touring: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
952 km on a full tank (6.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 29th of 77 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 6.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 318i Touring vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.