G20 · GENERATION 2019 · SALOON
BMWMHEV

320d xDrive

190 hp, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 19 saloons hybrid 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive ranks 6th of 19 in Combined consumption, 17th of 19 in Tank range, 15th of 19 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,51115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.9s

VMax 233 km/h

Cons.

4.6L

/100 km

Tank

40L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 320d xDrive

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.6 L/100km
Tank40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,9 s
VMax233 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,709 mm
Wheelbase2,851 mm
Width1,827 mm
Height1,445 mm
Boot480 L
Kerb weight1,540 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP125 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 19 saloons hybrid, the 320d xDrive ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 6th of 19 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 318d Steptronic (1st with 1439 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (6th of 19 in Combined consumption)

The 320d xDrive consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.1 L/100).

Tank range: 870 km (17th of 19 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320d xDrive covers 870 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1439 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 320d xDrive stands against saloons hybrid

Comparison across 19 saloons hybrid marketed between 2017–2021.

Combined consumption6e / 19
4.6 L/100
Min 7 L/100 · Bmw M340i xDriveMax 4.1 L/100 · Bmw 320d
Tank range17e / 19
870 km
Min 833 km · Bmw 318d TouringMax 1 439 km · Bmw 318d Steptronic
0–100 km/h15e / 19
6,9 s
Min 9,2 s · Bmw 318d SteptronicMax 4,4 s · Bmw M340i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Compare

Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive

Frequently asked questions

BMW 320d xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 19 saloons hybrid 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive ranks 6th of 19 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 17th of 19 in Tank range (870 km, behind the Bmw 318d Steptronic), 15th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the Bmw M340i xDrive).

870 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 17th of 19 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.