Among the 6 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive40i ranks 3rd of 5 in Combined consumption (9.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive30d), 3rd of 5 in Tank range (922 km, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive30d), 5th of 6 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Lamborghini Urus).
G07 · GENERATION 2018 → · LUXURY SUV
BMWICE
X7 xDrive40i
340 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 6 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive40i ranks 3rd of 5 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 5 in Tank range, 5th of 6 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.1s
VMax 245 km/h
Cons.
9.0L
/100 km
Tank
83L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X7 xDrive40i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,998 cm³ |
| Power | 340 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 83 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,1 s |
| VMax | 245 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,151 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,105 mm |
| Width | 2,000 mm |
| Height | 1,805 mm |
| Boot | 326 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,320 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 205 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 6 F-SUV, the X7 xDrive40i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 9.0 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 5 in Combined consumption)
The X7 xDrive40i consumes 9.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X7 xDrive30d (6.8 L/100).
Tank range: 922 km (3rd of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X7 xDrive40i covers 922 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1176 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X7 xDrive40i stands against F-SUV
Comparison across 6 F-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption3e / 5
9 L/100
Min 11.4 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive50iMax 6.8 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive30d
Tank range3e / 5
922 km
Min 728 km · Bmw X7 xDrive50iMax 1 176 km · Bmw X7 xDrive30d
0–100 km/h5e / 6
6,1 s
Min 7,0 s · Bmw X7 xDrive30dMax 3,6 s · Lamborghini Urus
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Urus SE653 hp · 0-100 3.4 s
G 450 d367 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
G 450 d367 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
G 500449 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X7 G07 range
Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G07
Compare
Popular duels involving the X7 xDrive40i
Frequently asked questions
BMW X7 xDrive40i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
922 km on a full tank (9.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 5 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X7 xDrive30d leads in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100 vs 9.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X7 xDrive40i vs Bmw X7 xDrive30d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.