G07 · GENERATION 2021 · LUXURY SUV
BMWMHEV

X7 xDrive40d

340 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 3 F-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X7 xDrive40d ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h, behind the only Bmw X7 xDrive40d. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,70315,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

340hp

700 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.1s

VMax 245 km/h

Cons.

6.6L

/100 km

Tank

80L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X7 xDrive40d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm\u00b3
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power340 hp
Couple700 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6,6 L/100km
Tank80 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,1 s
VMax245 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,151 mm
Wheelbase3,105 mm
Width2,000 mm
Height1,805 mm
Boot326 L
Kerb weight2,470 kg
Cd0.33
CO₂ WLTP173 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 3 F-SUV hybrid, the X7 xDrive40d ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X7 xDrive40d (1st with 6.6 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X7 xDrive40d (1st with 1212 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)

The X7 xDrive40d consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X7 xDrive40d (6.6 L/100).

Tank range: 1212 km (Tank range)

On a full tank, the X7 xDrive40d covers 1212 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1212 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X7 xDrive40d stands against F-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 3 F-SUV hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.

Combined consumption

2eout of 3

6.6 L/100
Min8.6 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max6.6 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive40d

Tank range

2eout of 3

1 212 km
Min965 km · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max1 212 km · Bmw X7 xDrive40d

0–100 km/h

2eout of 3

6,1 s
Min6,3 s · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max6,1 s · Bmw X7 xDrive40d

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X7 G07 range

Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G07

Compare

Popular duels involving the X7 xDrive40d

Take the next step

Find a X7 xDrive40d or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X7 xDrive40d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X7 xDrive40d rank in its segment?#

Among the 3 F-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X7 xDrive40d ranks Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive40d), Tank range (1212 km, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive40d), 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive40d).

What is the range of the X7 xDrive40d?#

1212 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) — autonomie du segment.

How much does the X7 xDrive40d cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X7 xDrive40d instead?#

The Bmw X7 xDrive40d leads in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X7 xDrive40d vs Bmw X7 xDrive40d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.