Among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic ranks 18th of 22 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 15th of 20 in Tank range (917 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 22th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (11.8 s, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive25d).
J11 · GENERATION 2016 → · COMPACT SUV
NissanICE
Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic
116 hp, 11,8 s 0-100 : among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic ranks 18th of 22 in Combined consumption, 15th of 20 in Tank range, 22th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
116hp
190 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
11.8s
VMax 190 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
55L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 116 hp |
| Couple | 190 Nm |
| Gearbox | CVT Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 55 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,8 s |
| VMax | 190 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,344 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 C-SUV, the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (18th of 22 in Combined consumption)
The Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 917 km (15th of 20 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic covers 917 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 22 C-SUV marketed between 2014–2018.
Combined consumption18e / 22
6 L/100
Min 7.7 L/100 · Jaguar E-PACE P200Max 4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
Tank range15e / 20
917 km
Min 850 km · Bmw X1 sDrive20iMax 1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
0–100 km/h22e / 22
11,8 s
Min 11,8 s · Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 XtronicMax 6,6 s · Bmw X1 xDrive25d
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
C5 Aircross PureTech 130 FWD132 hp · 0-100 10.7 s
X2 sDrive18i136 hp · 0-100 9.6 s
X1 sDrive18i140 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
X2 sDrive18i140 hp · 0-100 9.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic
Frequently asked questions
Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
917 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 15th of 20 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.