Among the 14 city cars 2021–2025, the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks 7th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 2nd of 7 in Tank range (786 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (9.6 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
208 PureTech 130 EAT8
131 hp, 9,6 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2021–2025, the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks 7th of 11 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 7 in Tank range, 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
131hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.6s
VMax 208 km/h
Cons.
5.6L
/100 km
Tank
44L
Full specifications Peugeot 208 PureTech 130 EAT8
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,199 cm³ |
| Power | 131 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 44 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,6 s |
| VMax | 208 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,055 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm |
| Height | 1,430 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,165 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 127 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 city cars, the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 7 in Tank range (786 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (7th of 11 in Combined consumption)
The 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 786 km (2nd of 7 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 covers 786 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 stands against city cars
Comparison across 14 city cars marketed between 2021–2025.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot 208 II range
Generation II launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Popular duels involving the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8
Peugeot 208 PureTech 130 EAT8: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
786 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 7 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 208 PureTech 130 EAT8 vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.