Among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo ranks 14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 14th of 42 in Top speed (314 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 16th of 42 in Power-to-weight (326 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
991.1 · GENERATION 2015 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Turbo
520 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 42 S 2013–2017, the 911 Turbo ranks 14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 14th of 42 in Top speed, 16th of 42 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
520hp
660 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.2s
VMax 314 km/h
Cons.
11.8L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 527 hp |
| Combined power | 520 hp |
| Couple | 660 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.8 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,2 s |
| VMax | 314 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,506 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,451 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm |
| Height | 1,295 mm |
| Boot | 265 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,595 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 42 S, the 911 Turbo ranks (top 14 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 14th of 42 in Top speed (314 km/h). 14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 14th of 42 in Top speed (314 km/h).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo ranks 14th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 314 km/h (14th of 42 in Top speed)
Top speed of 314 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Turbo stands against S
Comparison across 42 S marketed between 2013–2017.
0–100 km/h14e / 42
3,2 s
Min 5,1 s · Porsche 911 Targa 4Max 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed14e / 42
314 km/h
Min 274 km/h · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight16e / 42
326 hp/t
Min 225 hp/t · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Huracán EVO RWD610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Huracán LP 610-4610 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Huracán EVO639 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.