958.1 · GENERATION 2012 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)

304 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 23 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 23 in Combined consumption, 12th of 22 in Tank range, 21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,84515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

304hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.5s

VMax 230 km/h

Cons.

12.7L

/100 km

Tank

84.793184L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement3,598 cm³
Puissance thermique304 hp
Combined power304 hp
Combined torque400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12.7 L/100km
Tank84.793184 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,5 s
VMax230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,895 mm
Width1,939 mm
Height1,705 mm
Boot671 L
Kerb weight2,030 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 23 E-SUV, the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks (top 8 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

E-SUV among the best in segment: 8th of 23 in Combined consumption (12.7 L/100).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 7.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 1265 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 12.7 L/100 L/100 (8th of 23 in Combined consumption)

The Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) consumes 12.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).

Tank range: 668 km (12th of 22 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) covers 668 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1265 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 23 E-SUV marketed between 2010–2014.

Combined consumption8e / 23
12.69 L/100
Min 15.52 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne S (Tiptronic S)Max 7.9 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
Tank range12e / 22
668 km
Min 213 km · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 1 265 km · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
0–100 km/h21e / 23
7,5 s
Min 8,0 s · Porsche Cayenne (Tiptronic S)Max 4,4 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S): what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 23 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 23 in Combined consumption (12.7 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 12th of 22 in Tank range (668 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

668 km on a full tank (12.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 12th of 22 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.