Cayenne (Tiptronic S)
294 hp, 8,0 s 0-100 : among the 16 E-SUV 2008–2012, the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) ranks 14th of 16 in Combined consumption, 8th of 16 in Tank range, 16th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
294hp
370 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.0s
VMax 227 km/h
Cons.
14.5L
/100 km
Tank
99.934824L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne (Tiptronic S)
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Naturally Aspirated |
| Displacement | 3,598 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance thermique | 294 hp |
| Combined power | 294 hp |
| Combined torque | 370 Nm |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER 6 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 14,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 99.934824 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,0 s |
| VMax | 227 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,798 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,855 mm |
| Width | 1,928 mm |
| Height | 1,699 mm |
| Boot | 541 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,170 kg |
| Cd | 0.35 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 16 E-SUV, the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 14.5 L/100 L/100 (14th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The Cayenne (Tiptronic S) consumes 14.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6 (9.9 L/100).
Tank range: 688 km (8th of 16 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) covers 688 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 859 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 16 E-SUV marketed between 2008–2012.
Combined consumption
14eout of 16
Tank range
8eout of 16
0–100 km/h
16eout of 16
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic
253 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
Q7 SUV
340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i
340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Q7 SUV
340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne (Tiptronic S)
Take the next step
Find a Cayenne (Tiptronic S) or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne (Tiptronic S): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 16 E-SUV 2008–2012, the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) ranks 14th of 16 in Combined consumption (14.5 L/100, behind the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6), 8th of 16 in Tank range (688 km, behind the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6), 16th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (8.0 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo).
688 km on a full tank (14.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 8th of 16 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw ActiveHybrid X6 leads in Combined consumption (9.9 L/100 vs 14.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne (Tiptronic S) vs Bmw ActiveHybrid X6 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.