Volvo XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic
253 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2012–2016, the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic ranks 2nd of 22 in Combined consumption, 20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 253 hp
- 350 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.4 s
- VMax 225 km/h
- Cons.
- 8.9 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- -
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Power
- 253 hp
- Couple
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 8.9 L/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,4 s
- VMax
- 225 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 2,105 kg
- Cd
- 0.36
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 E-SUV, the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
E-SUV among the best in segment: 2nd of 22 in Combined consumption (8.9 L/100).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 7.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 8.9 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 22 in Combined consumption)
The XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic consumes 8.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic stands against E-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic
Continue with the Volvo XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic
The same car, from other angles.
Volvo XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic rank in its segment?
Among the 22 E-SUV 2012–2016, the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic ranks 2nd of 22 in Combined consumption (8.9 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
How much does the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Cayenne Diesel instead?
The Porsche Cayenne Diesel leads in Combined consumption (7.9 L/100 vs 8.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the XC90 T5 AWD Geartronic vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.