Porsche Panamera Turbo S
550 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 17 limousines 2010–2014, the Panamera Turbo S ranks 3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 17 in Top speed, 5th of 17 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 550 hp
- 800 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3.9 s
- VMax 306 km/h
- Cons.
- 13.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 99.934824 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 8 cyl. · Atmosphérique
- Displacement
- 5 cm³
- Power
- 550 hp
- Combined torque
- 800 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 13.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 99.934824 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3,9 s
- VMax
- 306 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,971 mm
- Width
- 2,113 mm
- Height
- 1,417 mm
- Boot
- 15 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,995 kg
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 limousines, the Panamera Turbo S ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 2nd of 17 in Top speed (306 km/h), 5th of 17 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t). 3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 2nd of 17 in Top speed (306 km/h), 5th of 17 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 306 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Panamera Turbo S ranks 3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo (3.9 s).
Top speed: 306 km/h (2nd of 17 in Top speed)
Top speed of 306 km/h. The segment reference reaches 306 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Panamera Turbo S stands against limousines
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Panamera Turbo S
Continue with the Porsche Panamera Turbo S
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Panamera Turbo S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Panamera Turbo S rank in its segment?
Among the 17 limousines 2010–2014, the Panamera Turbo S ranks 3rd of 17 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 2nd of 17 in Top speed (306 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 5th of 17 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S).
How much does the Panamera Turbo S cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Panamera Turbo instead?
The Porsche Panamera Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera Turbo S vs Porsche Panamera Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.