Among the 22 saloons hybrid 2020–2024, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks 20th of 21 in Combined consumption (7.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 14th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s, behind the Bmw M340i xDrive).
II · GENERATION 2022 → · SALOON
VolvoMHEV
V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
253 hp, 6,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 saloons hybrid 2020–2024, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks 20th of 21 in Combined consumption, 14th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
253hp
350 Nm · 14 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.7s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
7.2L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Volvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 14 hp |
| Combined power | 253 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,7 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,752 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 saloons hybrid, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Less suitable for
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M340i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.2 L/100 L/100 (20th of 21 in Combined consumption)
The V60 B5 AWD Geartronic consumes 7.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic stands against saloons hybrid
Comparison across 22 saloons hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption20e / 21
7.2 L/100
Min 8 L/100 · Bmw M440i Gran CoupéMax 4.1 L/100 · Bmw 320d
0–100 km/h14e / 22
6,7 s
Min 8,9 s · Bmw 318d TouringMax 4,4 s · Bmw M340i xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
330e252 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
330e292 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
330e Touring292 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
330e xDrive292 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Volvo V60 II range
Generation II launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Compare
Popular duels involving the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
Frequently asked questions
Volvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 7.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.