V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
253 hp, 6,7 s 0-100 : among the 21 saloons hybrid 2020–2024, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks 20th of 21 in Combined consumption, 14th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
253hp
350 Nm · 14 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.7s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
7.2L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Volvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 14 hp |
| Combined power | 253 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7,2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,7 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,752 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 21 saloons hybrid, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Less suitable for
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M340i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.2 L/100 L/100 (20th of 21 in Combined consumption)
The V60 B5 AWD Geartronic consumes 7.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic stands against saloons hybrid
Comparison across 21 saloons hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption
20eout of 21
0–100 km/h
14eout of 21
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
330e
292 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
330e xDrive Touring
292 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
330e xDrive
292 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
330e Touring
292 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Volvo V60 II range
Generation II launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Compare
Popular duels involving the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic
Take the next step
Find a V60 B5 AWD Geartronic or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Volvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 21 saloons hybrid 2020–2024, the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic ranks 20th of 21 in Combined consumption (7.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 14th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s, behind the Bmw M340i xDrive).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 7.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the V60 B5 AWD Geartronic vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.