Among the 17 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Diesel ranks 4th of 17 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 11th of 16 in Tank range (259 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 12th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
Porsche Cayenne Diesel
262 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Diesel ranks 4th of 17 in Combined consumption, 11th of 16 in Tank range, 12th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
262hp
580 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.2s
VMax 217 km/h
Cons.
10.2L
/100 km
Tank
26.4L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
- Displacement
- 2,967 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 243 hp
- Combined power
- 262 hp
- Combined torque
- 580 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 10.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 26.4 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,2 s
- VMax
- 217 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,854 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,896 mm
- Width
- 1,999 mm
- Height
- 1,712 mm
- Boot
- 24 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,110 kg
- Cd
- 0.36
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne Diesel ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
E-SUV among the best in segment: 4th of 17 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 7.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 1265 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 10.2 L/100 L/100 (4th of 17 in Combined consumption)
The Cayenne Diesel consumes 10.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).
Tank range: 259 km (11th of 16 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cayenne Diesel covers 259 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1265 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Cayenne Diesel stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2013–2017.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Cayenne 958.2 range
Generation 958.2 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 958.2
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Diesel
Porsche Cayenne Diesel: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
259 km on a full tank (10.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 11th of 16 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Diesel leads in Combined consumption (7.9 L/100 vs 10.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Diesel vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.