Diesellarge SUVGENERATION 958.2, 2015

Porsche Cayenne Diesel

262 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Diesel ranks 4th of 17 in Combined consumption, 11th of 16 in Tank range, 12th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power

262hp

580 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.2s

VMax 217 km/h

Cons.

10.2L

/100 km

Tank

26.4L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
V · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement
2,967 cm³
Puissance thermique
243 hp
Combined power
262 hp
Combined torque
580 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
10.2 L/100 km
Tank
26.4 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,2 s
VMax
217 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,854 mm
Wheelbase
2,896 mm
Width
1,999 mm
Height
1,712 mm
Boot
24 L
Kerb weight
2,110 kg
Cd
0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne Diesel ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

E-SUV among the best in segment: 4th of 17 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 7.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 1265 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 10.2 L/100 L/100 (4th of 17 in Combined consumption)

The Cayenne Diesel consumes 10.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).

Tank range: 259 km (11th of 16 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Cayenne Diesel covers 259 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1265 km.

Where the Cayenne Diesel stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2013–2017.

Combined consumption4e / 17
10.2 L/100
Min 13.8 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne TurboMax 7.9 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
Tank range11e / 16
259 km
Min 213 km · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 1 265 km · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
0–100 km/h12e / 17
7,2 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 3,9 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Porsche Cayenne 958.2 range

Generation 958.2 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 958.2

Popular duels involving the Cayenne Diesel

Porsche Cayenne Diesel: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Diesel ranks 4th of 17 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 11th of 16 in Tank range (259 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 12th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

259 km on a full tank (10.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 11th of 16 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Cayenne Diesel leads in Combined consumption (7.9 L/100 vs 10.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Diesel vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.