Porsche Cayenne Turbo
520 hp, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 12 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 12 in Top speed, 6th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 520 hp
- 750 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.2 s
- VMax 278 km/h
- Cons.
- 11.3 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 26.4 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
- Displacement
- 4,806 cm³
- ICE power
- 527 hp
- Combined power
- 520 hp
- Combined torque
- 750 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 11.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 26.4 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,2 s
- VMax
- 278 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,854 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,896 mm
- Width
- 1,999 mm
- Height
- 1,702 mm
- Boot
- 24 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,185 kg
- Cd
- 0.36
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s). 3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 283 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.2 s 0-100 (3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (3.9 s).
Top speed: 278 km/h (5th of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 278 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Cayenne Turbo stands against E-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Cayenne 958.2 range
Generation 958.2 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 958.2
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo
Continue with the Porsche Cayenne Turbo
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Cayenne Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Cayenne Turbo rank in its segment?
Among the 12 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 3rd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 5th of 12 in Top speed (278 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 6th of 12 in Power-to-weight (238 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
How much does the Cayenne Turbo cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S instead?
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 4.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.